Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ EH: 355 ]

Total 355 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TowerTalk] TX RELAYS (score: 2)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
The thing to remember is that relays are rated for hot switching. In ham radio use, that should "never" happen. Thus the relays are actually good for quite a bit more power. Rick N6RK _______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00488.html (11,461 bytes)

122. Re: [TowerTalk] TX RELAYS (score: 2)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:33:49 -0400
On the other hand, TopTen has used very inexpensive DPDT relays in its 1500-watt remote relay switchboxes for a decade or more. They are Panasonic brand JW1FSN-DC12V (12V coil), priced at 2-05 in one
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00486.html (10,245 bytes)

123. Re: [TowerTalk] TX RELAYS (score: 2)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:46:42 -0700
Bear in mind also that you've calculated for the proverbial (and non-existent) "well matched system". The typical rule of thumb is to require design to 10dB over or test to 6dB over the expected maxi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00462.html (8,724 bytes)

124. Re: [TowerTalk] CDE AR-40 Oddity (score: 2)
Author: "John & Peggy" <bankhein@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:26:25 -0500
bankhein@frontiernet.net John K0JJH Mark: First, let me say I am no expert on these units, but I have some familiarity and have brought some back to life. It sounds like you have an AR-22 unit, not a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00423.html (10,295 bytes)

125. Re: [TowerTalk] CDE AR-40 Oddity (score: 2)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:24:24 -0400
Mark: First, let me say I am no expert on these units, but I have some familiarity and have brought some back to life. It sounds like you have an AR-22 unit, not an AR-40. Similar units, but the 22 u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00404.html (9,585 bytes)

126. Re: [TowerTalk] CDE AR-40 Oddity (score: 2)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:54:32 -0700
Hi Mark Not sure if that is like the rotor I used to have, but on the one I had, there was a lever on the bottom of the control box that set the end stop for the rotor. You could swing the rotor all
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00399.html (8,439 bytes)

127. [TowerTalk] CDE AR-40 Oddity (score: 2)
Author: butwheat <butwheat73@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:04:23 -0400
Greetings, I recently was given an old CDE rotor, I'm thinking it's an AR-40, as it has the familiar bell housing for the motor, but the lay flat on the table control with the old fashioned clicketyc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00374.html (7,072 bytes)

128. Re: [TowerTalk] Loop vs Dipole...I'm original "asker" (score: 2)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:24:36 -0400
Yes... I figured that... but I kinda liked the term, anyway. Sounds sort of dressy. And, besides, a top hat has a flat top. So, maybe not so far off, eh? ;-) Thanks for the clarification, but I figur
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00638.html (9,148 bytes)

129. Re: [TowerTalk] new member with tower question (score: 2)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 07:29:53 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
--Original Message-- Well, there is that... Even if the pipe is 3/4" wall, the bending loads are huge in this sort of thing, you need to calculate some stuff to see if it's going to work. 4" is prett
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00571.html (11,626 bytes)

130. Re: [TowerTalk] tower ground question (score: 2)
Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:29:58 -0400
David, I would venture to say there are more insulated, serial fed towers in the air, than grounded through the foundation amateur towers, by a fair margin. But I could be wrong, and it's totally aca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00533.html (14,983 bytes)

131. Re: [TowerTalk] tower ground question (score: 2)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:03:21 -0700
Per your comments, the two towers you refer to were isolated from the concrete base. That is the same condition described by Polyphaser for the single semi-verified claim of an exploding base they co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00528.html (12,813 bytes)

132. Re: [TowerTalk] tower ground question (score: 2)
Author: "David Calder" <towertalk@n4zkf.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 10:03:23 -0400
I can show you pics of what it will do to a foundation on our towers first hand. It isn't pretty. 73 Dave n4zkf Southeastern Territory Supervisor American Tower Corporation David, Urban legends? I do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00511.html (13,874 bytes)

133. Re: [TowerTalk] tower ground question (score: 2)
Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 06:50:43 -0400
David, Urban legends? I don't think so. WCTC-AM, New Brunswick, NJ. Took multiple strikes, and had structural cracks in the foundation afterward. This was in the 1965's, when I worked there as an eng
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00504.html (12,670 bytes)

134. Re: [TowerTalk] Maine Winters (score: 2)
Author: Mirko S57AD <miroslav.sibilja@amis.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:01:36 +0100
I'm falling in love with Maine! 73 Mirko, S57AD Craig Clark pravi: _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00290.html (12,049 bytes)

135. [TowerTalk] Maine Winters (score: 2)
Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@wildblue.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:02:33 -0500
I know LXC is going to stop this thread soon. But I have to chime in as I lived in Maine for four years (66-70) and would go back in a nano-second if I didn't live in my second choice heaven, NH. Mai
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00285.html (10,329 bytes)

136. Re: [TowerTalk] [Amps] Interesting Merger in the Works? (score: 2)
Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 08:43:23 -0800
You may be right, sad to say. The price of the gear might become (more) stratospheric, then the bean counters will want the ham product line dropped "due to poor consumer demand". I hope not, but I d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00165.html (12,017 bytes)

137. [TowerTalk] FW: [Amps] Interesting Merger in the Works? (score: 2)
Author: "Sadtip" <sad.tip@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:18:36 -0500
How about Movertard:-) RoD A good friend will come and bail you out of jail, A TRUE friend will be sitting next to you saying..... "DAMN THAT WAS FUN" _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00134.html (9,515 bytes)

138. Re: [TowerTalk] [Amps] Interesting Merger in the Works? (score: 2)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:17:29 -0700
More like nomoreyaesu or You thought ham gear was pricey before... _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00133.html (9,915 bytes)

139. Re: [Amps] Interesting Merger in the Works? (score: 2)
Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 14:55:03 -0800
Motor-asu? Yaesu-rola? Eh? Gary _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00128.html (8,657 bytes)

140. Re: [TowerTalk] Hygain pushup masts for 80m verticals? (score: 2)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:53:29 -0400
Please do the next time you see one using a thin wall steel mast with less than perfect plating that may quickly rust in some enviroments. So is Ameritron and their amps pretty much own the market. H
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00554.html (10,919 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu