Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ EH: 355 ]

Total 355 documents matching your query.

221. [Towertalk] Crankup Tubular "Towers" (score: 2)
Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt & Carrie Trott)
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 23:15:41 -0600
I don't know how the new ones are built, but I have an old 40' tubular tower that I think was built by Tristao (similar to the MA-40). The channel 'key' is (was) held in place by several flathead scr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00136.html (10,015 bytes)

222. [Towertalk] Crankup Tubular "Towers" (score: 2)
Author: n5bsd@rblprd.com (John von Gonten)
Date: 01 Oct 2002 15:56:45 -0500
I have been considering the US Tower MA-40 or MA-550 crankup tubular tower as they call them, closer to a tubular crankup mast IMHO. has anyone had any dealing with these in real world situations, th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00132.html (7,931 bytes)

223. [Towertalk] Mast Coupler? (score: 2)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:23:31 -0700
This seems beaten to death now, but honestly, who can't support a 16' aluminum 2" mast by holding its lower four feet length, as anybody more than 5'6" tall could do, belted near the top of a tower?
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00901.html (10,256 bytes)

224. [Towertalk] Mast Coupler? (score: 2)
Author: Mark <AA6DX@pacbell.net> (Mark)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:53:05 -0700
The problem here is that this is like holding a broom by its last 3 inches, in a vertical position, and DOING something with it... sure, you can do that .. but not for VERY LONG ... and Jim has it ri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00899.html (8,654 bytes)

225. [Towertalk] Mast Coupler? (score: 2)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:01:12 -0400
if you are using two pieces spliced why bother with the extension... typically a splice is synonymous with failure point, eh? Suspect you want to have about half of it in the tower and half of it out
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00896.html (9,060 bytes)

226. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 2)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 07:35:15 -0700
Hi Joe, In the latest QST ad, which I just saw for the first time, the data appears very believable. Their on-line data sheet (last I looked, a week or so ago) states "20 to 50 dB" F/B on all bands,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00729.html (12,047 bytes)

227. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 2)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:10:25 -0600
For those who want better F/B on 10M with the SteppIR 3L Yagi, a separate 10M reflector could also be added which I expect would not degrade performance on the lower bands. That is a common practice
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00739.html (12,971 bytes)

228. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 2)
Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 19:02:05 -0400
Steve, I didn't look at the Fludid Motion specs. but I know the antenna is not optimum on 6 meters and I doubt they make that claim. If you check the literature, you will see that they have an option
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00697.html (12,142 bytes)

229. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 2)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 07:12:53 -0700
Roger that, Mike. But modeling indicates less than 15 dB F/B as best achievable on 10m, and about 12 dB on 12m; don't think the extra 6m element will help those, although possibly it does. Anybody h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00538.html (12,736 bytes)

230. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 2)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 07:08:37 -0700
Three elements, the standard configuration. I realize there's a stationary 4th element available for the 6m configuration, but don't know where they put it...will try to find out. -WB2WIK/6
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00537.html (12,317 bytes)

231. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 2)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:35:40 -0700
Steve, There is an optional fixed 6 meter director available for the SteppIR that is suppose to greatly improves the F/B ratio: http://www.steppir.com/ Look under the "products" tab for the "6 meter
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00463.html (12,697 bytes)

232. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 2)
Author: rmoodyg@bellsouth.net (Richard M. Gillingham)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:09:12 -0400
Hi Steve. I have the steppir, but I'm clueless about modelling antennas. Only one question. Did you do the 6 M model for 3 or 4 elements. The optimum Steppir configuration is for 4 elements using the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00462.html (12,335 bytes)

233. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 2)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:41:52 -0700
Yeah, Mark, the real trick setup would be a stepper actuated telescoping boom with SteppIR elements attached (it wouldn't surprise me if they were already working on one). 73 de Mike, W4EF...........
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00458.html (10,049 bytes)

234. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 2)
Author: w5kp@swbell.net (Jerry Kincade)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:40:34 -0500
Clearly, the next evolutionary level will be a StepIR on a 36' motorized telescoping boom. 73, Jerry W5KP fixed http://www.mscomputer.com additional 5 percent off
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00457.html (9,859 bytes)

235. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 2)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:39:17 -0700
[Steve Katz] Mark, I have to agree. Unless this antenna defies all the modeling programs, using a 16' boom and fixed element locations provided in the SteppIR manual, and modeling using NEC, if I ad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00459.html (10,750 bytes)

236. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 2)
Author: mark@concertart.com (Mark Beckwith)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:34:48 -0500
That depends on how you define the word "optimized," eh? I don't call fixed element locations on the boom optimized on more than one band. Mark, N5OT
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00455.html (8,675 bytes)

237. [Towertalk] T2X Start cap at tower base? (score: 2)
Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:52:15 -0400
Tony, In the past some people put the capacitor close to the rotator to free up 2 extra wires to parallel with others. This helps but I don't think the need for mounting the capacitor at the rotator
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00438.html (12,246 bytes)

238. [Towertalk] T2X Start cap at tower base? (score: 2)
Author: n2tk@arrl.net (N2TK)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:47:29 -0400
Ditto. Works fine doing it this way. Closer tot eh rotor the better for the motor start cap. Plus you get to double up two wires. It's a win-win. Tony N2TK --Original Message-- From: towertalk-admin@
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00418.html (10,010 bytes)

239. [Towertalk] Rats with wings (score: 2)
Author: feutz@wctc.net (Ron Feutz)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 16:00:35 -0500
'ey der mon. No problem eh? Airee Airee. Ron - WA9IRV
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00720.html (7,542 bytes)

240. [Towertalk] Cushcraft A3S Remodeling ?? (score: 2)
Author: Robert Webb" <g0urr@btopenworld.com (Robert Webb)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 19:26:06 +0100
Hello everyone, I have a Cushcraft A3S only 6 months old with a slightly bent boom ( my fault ). So I am going to replace the boom. This led me to thinking, If the boom was longer and the elements we
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00268.html (7,040 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu