Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] parasitic suppressors

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] parasitic suppressors
From: Peter.Chadwick@gpsemi.com (Peter Chadwick)
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 15:12:59 +0100
Looking at the N7WS figures,  the thing that strikes me is the way the
shunt resistance is increasing on the nichrome resisitors with
frequency. If you model it as a perfect inductor with a constant series
fixed resistance, I guess that is what would happen - Rs stays constant,
but jX goes up. Modelling it as a perfect inductor with a fixed shunt R
is possible, but it strains my credulity a bit. But the series method
provides a model which matches the measurements.

So if the Q isn't to rise with frequency, you need the shunt resistors -
which need to be low inductance -and capacitance.

Hmmm. Doesn't that take away some of the raison d'etre for the nichrome?
Although I can still envisage places where it could be advantageous.

On a different tack, anyone any experience with 4CX1000A's (at HF) and
parasitics?

73

Peter G3RZP

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>