Nicely done, Mike.
On behalf of everyone, (who cares), Thank you!.
Happy Y2K,
Mike(y)
W3SLK
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Michon <michon@eatel.net>
To: Lars Harlin <harlins@swipnet.se>; Mike Sawyer <kc4slk@csrlink.net>;
<amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing...
> This reminds me of the daf amplifier debate.
>
> Mike
> AB5XP
>
>
>
> Alan Watts:
>
>
> There are basically two kinds of philosophy. One's called prickles, the
> other's
> called goo. And prickly people are precise, rigorous, logical. They like
> everything chopped up and clear. Goo people like it vague. For example, in
> physics, prickly people believe that the ultimate constituents of matter
> are
> particles. Goo people believe it's waves. And in philosophy, prickly
people
>
> are
> logical positivists, and goo people are idealists. And they're always
> arguing
> with each other, but what they don't realize is neither one can take his
> position without the other person. Because you wouldn't know you advocated
> prickles unless there was someone advocating goo. You wouldn't know what a
> prickle was unless you knew what a goo was. Because life isn't either
> prickles
> or goo, it's either gooey prickles or prickly goo. They go together like
> back
> and front, male and female. And that's the answer to philosophy. You see,
> I'm
> a
> philosopher, and I'm not going to argue very much, because if you don't
> argue
> with me, I don't know what I think. So if we argue, I say 'Thank you,'
> because
> owing to the courtesy of your taking a different point of view, I
> understand
> what I mean. So I can't get rid of you.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Harlin <harlins@swipnet.se>
> To: Mike Sawyer <kc4slk@csrlink.net>; amps@contesting.com
> <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Date: Friday, December 31, 1999 7:23 AM
> Subject: SV: [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing...
>
>
> >
> >
> >----- Ursprungligt meddelande -----
> >Från: Mike Sawyer <kc4slk@csrlink.net>
> >Till: <amps@contesting.com>; <nospam4me@juno.com>
> >Skickat: den 31 december 1999 14:42
> >Ämne: Re: [AMPS] daf amplifier circuit, on air testing...
> >
> >
> >
> >> It appears that this circuit would use far less materials to construct
> (i.e.
> >> lack of a screen supply).
> >> If it was even close to a great design, companies like QRO, Command,
> Alpha
> >> Power etc, (Ameritron
> >> wouldn't hesitate) would be falling "ass-over-tin-cups" producing it!
> >
> >> Of course this is the only side of the argument I can take up since I
> have
> >> never heard one on the air.
> >
> >Or ever seen one? Used one? Built one?
> >Good platform for reveiw...!
> >
> >Mike, in a few hours we have seen the new Millennium - You have´nt !
;-o))
> >
> >73 de Lars/SM3BDZ
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
> >Submissions: amps@contesting.com
> >Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> >Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
> >Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
> >
> >
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|