on 3/13/00 4:18 AM, Carsten Groen at cgroen@image.dk wrote:
> Regarding "Mission impossible" thread a
> while back,
> have a look at receiver performance etc
> at:
>
>
> http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/20
> 0003/msg00116.html
Someone mentioned these tests on another reflector I am on.
I don't think they are at all accurate. They show an FT-1000D with about
the same performance as an FT-847. Trust me, I have both and the FT-1000D
BLOWS the 847 away. Secondly, they show the FT-990 having BETTER
performance than the 1000D. How can that be? They both have pretty much
the same receiver.
73,
Jon
KE9NA
-------------------------------------
Jon Ogden
KE9NA
Member: ARRL, AMSAT, DXCC, NRA
http://www.qsl.net/ke9na
"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|