To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] Amps Power Conservation Measure |
From: | rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal) |
Date: | Thu, 01 Feb 2001 09:02:11 -0800 |
Lamb wrote: > > The third is to use cw and transmit 10% faster. I have not thought about > whether a 10% increase would in fact give a 10% decrease in power usage - it > would probably have to be 12% faster or so. Or you could just drive it with one of the Japanese transceivers that clip all of the dits and dahs (ICOM 706 comes to mind). 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Amps Power Conservation Measure, Lamb |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] Additional Tube Brand Question, measures |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Amps Power Conservation Measure, Lamb |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Amps Power Conservation Measure, George T. Daughters |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |