To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Amps] re: CTI screen regulator, tubes vs solid state++ |
From: | wwd@netheaven.com (wwd@netheaven.com) |
Date: | Sat, 22 Jun 2002 11:46:22 -0400 |
In <200206221322.g5MDMfKF002113@contesting.com>, on 06/22/2002 at 06:24 AM, Richard <2@mail.vcnet.com> said: >To me Alex, he sounds like a tube-type 33rpm audiophile who believes >tubes and vinyl sound way better every time. >>What is "attack" and "release" of regulation cycle. Does he mean >>"transient response" ? >> >>Alex But unlike much [hollow/solid-state/analog/digital] emotionalism, any regulation issues such as these should be easily demo'd on a scope. Give me a good zener string anyday. Bill K2AME |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] Re: Big HV Transformer for Sale, wwd@netheaven.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] re: CTI screen regulator, tubes vs solid state, Tom Rauch |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] re: CTI screen regulator, tubes vs solid state++, Richard |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] re: refused cti web site..., skipp isaham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |