Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Re: Amps Digest, Vol 12, Issue 35

To: <gw4dgu@blaenffos.org>, " AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Re: Amps Digest, Vol 12, Issue 35
From: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 06:55:55 -0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>

>> **  I have yet to hear a Ham station on SSB who is getting 90% efficiency
>
>Neither have I. But that's not the point of the discussion I was trying to
>have. I was just trying to point-out that many hams are unaware of some of
>the developments in transmitter design which have taken place since the
>1950s, and that there are techniques being commonly used elsewhere which we
>could use to our advantage.
>
>As it happens, switching mode amplifiers (class-E, F, and beyond) can work
>well to beyond the vhf region, but not as linear amplifiers. There's an
>active group using them for CW PAs on the low bands - usually using cheap
>general purpose power mosfets. Have a look at the Web.
>
>But, it is entirely practicable to make an ssb transmitter with a switching
>mode PA if you go about it the right way! There's a transmitter topology
>(patented by the remarkable, and sadly late, Vlad Petrovic)  - polar loop
>linearisation - which has been used in the past, and looks like it might be
>making a comeback for cellphone base transmitters. A 90% efficient ssb
>transmitter at HF could be a reality if someone had the time and backup to
>design it.
>
**  The sticky wicket with Class-E  for Ham applications could well be 
the requirement for wide frequency coverage.   However, since some Hams 
already use electron-tube monobander amps, maybe they would be the first 
to switch to switching-mode monoband amplifiers?   
>
cheers, Chris
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>