Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Pi or Pi-L

To: "'Angelo Karabetsos'" <ve3yn@hotmail.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Pi or Pi-L
From: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:20:50 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Second harmonic attenuation, and less C2 is required than a pi.
A torroid conserves space, and can be mounted next to the chassis.

(((73)))
Phil Clements, K5PC




Subject: [Amps] Pi or Pi-L

Other than lower harmonic distortion, what is the benefit of going with a 
Pi-L tank? What is the typical efficiency of the two? Often a toroid is used

for L2. Is the main reason to conserve space?

Cheers VE3YN

_________________________________________________________________
MSN. Calendar keeps you organized and takes the effort out of scheduling 
get-togethers. 
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=htt
p://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines 
  Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN. Premium right now and get the 
first two months FREE*.



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>