I prefer octal because I only need to fold my thumbs under in order to be
able to count. With hex I have to walk around with one shoe off and my fly
unzipped :-)
73, Jerry K0TV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Metric system
> Being a programmer I prefer base 16 (hexadecimal). Next January I will
> celebrate 40th birthday. <grin>
>
> 73, Keith NM5G
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Steve Thompson
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 11:16 AM
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Metric system
>
>
>
> Colin Lamb wrote:
>> I am getting to the age when I would like to convert from the present
> system of measuring age in years to something with a bit more time between
> anniversaries - something like 500 days per measurement, or so. Not sure
> if
> converting will allow retroactive application, but even applied to the
> future would be acceptable.
>
> Without telling anyone, I switched to counting in 12s (Babylonian?) for
> 'special' birthdays. Everyone thinks it's going to be a big deal when I
> hit
> 50, but I'm looking at 60 as the next big party.
>> Perhaps aging can be based upon time between amplifiers, or time taken to
> construct amplifiers.
>
> That would make me extrememly young, or extremely old, depending on which
> way it works :-)
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|