Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Fwd: Re: Bill Orr comment

To: "'Amps Reflector'" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Fwd: Re: Bill Orr comment
From: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:16:46 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
My Al-1500 (8877) will do 2,600 watts into a dummy load key down on 17
meters with 100 watts of drive as measured on an LP-100.

Mike

-----Original Message-----


Bill Orr was hardly a quack. Very knowledgeable and nice guy, met him 
several times over the years. An 8877 will get pretty darn close to 2 X. It 
was used in at least one 2.5 KW commercial FM transmitter that I know of and

by FCC rule the transmitter had to be capable of 110% rated power (2750W). 
And that is CCS!
73's
Chuck
W6RD
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <k9mk@flash.net>
To: "Commander John" <crazytvjohn@yahoo.com>; <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Fwd: Re: Bill Orr comment


>
>     I can't speak to todays class of ceramic tubes but in the 70's I built

> a number of 3-1000Z amps.  The rule of thunb for a well designed AB amp 
> was 2:1, output power vs. dissipation.  So, yes I agree with the Orr's 
> "rule of thumb" here.  The 3-1000Z typically did 2:1 RF out 80m-15m but it

> did require a well thought out RF deck.  I will not name names here but I 
> saw a dozens of what I call stressed 4-1000A amps that made it to the 
> 2.5:1 ouput ratio.
>
>    It is probably related to the manufacturers design but I have never 
> seen 3KW from an 8877 or even 1600W from a 3CX800...  Either something is 
> being lost in translation or it kinda makes you wonder about the claims 
> surrounding our modern ceramic tubes...
>
> 73's    Mike  K9MK/5
>
>
>
>
> -------------- Original message from Commander John 
> <crazytvjohn@yahoo.com>: -------------- 
>
>
>>
>> Commander John wrote: Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:23:38
>> -0700 (PDT)
>> From: Commander John
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] Bill Orr comment
>> To: Peter Voelpel
>>
>> Who is this "quack" guru?
>> john w9zy
>>
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~w9zy
>>
>> Peter Voelpel wrote:
>> 2-2.5 times the dissipation is normal.
>> Assume 1500 out, at 70% efficiency that is 643W dissipation, 
>> 1500/643=2.33.
>> Eimac claims 75% efficiency on their 3CX3000A7 datasheet in AB2.
>>
>> 73
>> Peter
>>
>> -----Original Message----- 
>> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
>> Behalf Of Gudguyham@aol.com
>> Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2008 18:30
>> To: amps@contesting.com
>> Subject: [Amps] Bill Orr comment
>>
>> I was reading the Bill Orr handbook and on his section about amplifiers 
>> he
>> says.....A properly designed grounded grid amplifier should produce 2 to 
>> 2.5
>> times the plate dissapation of the tube in output. He did not put any
>> limitations on the statement as to IMD or anything like that. He did not
>> say if the tubes ratings would be surpassed (I am sure they would), but I
>> think what he was saying is that the tube should continue to make power 
>> to 2
>> to 2.5 times it's dissapation before it would not make any more power and
>> flatten out.
>>
>> Upon speaking with an amp "Guru" about this subject, he procalimed that
>> Bill Orr was a "QUACK". The basis of his claim was that he was never able
>> to build an amplifier that obtained that kind of results.
>> What say you? Lou W1QJ
>>
>>
>>
>> **************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for
>> FanHouse Fantasy Football today.
>> (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> W9ZY
>> .... Commander John ....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> W9ZY
>> .... Commander John ....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>