Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques

To: <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:20:02 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Call Eimac yourself and stop blubbering.

Carl


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Cc: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques


ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:08:06 -0400, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:

>The comment I most remember from the Eimac engineer is that
>Measures was responsible for more destoyed 8877's than all other sources
>combined since the tube came out.

REPLY:

That is quite a remarkable statement. Before you besmirch Rich's reputation 
any
further, can you back up your statement with names, dates and facts?

73, Bill W6WRT 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>