Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:13:36 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:24:11 -0400, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:

>
>My opinion has nothing to do with it; Im relating to facts.
>
>It was published in QST so any ARRL member should be able to access it. It 
>was written by Bill Orr and a follow up by one of the ARRL staff. I want to 
>say early 60's. It may also be in the Orr book or an Eimac publication.
>Id look it up myself but Im leaving for Canada in a few minutes.

REPLY:

I'm not going to do your work for you. If I look up Orr or anyone else
and don't find it, you'll say I looked in the wrong place. 

When I quote somebody, I cut and paste the original quote. How about
it, Carl? 

Or are you "too busy" to back up your statements? We can wait for you
to get back from Canada. 

Still waiting to hear why suppressor coils "MUST" be self-resonant.
Must is your word, not mine. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>