Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Solid State Relays Again

To: donroden@hiwaay.net, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Solid State Relays Again
From: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>
Reply-to: g8on@fsmail.net
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:47:11 +0100
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
If you switch at zero voltage, there is no EMF to drive a current through the 
load impedance. A quarter cycle later, when there is EMF across the load, the 
current will lead or lag by a factor depending on the phase angle and magnitude 
of the impedance. So there's a difference between the transient condition 
existing for the first part of the cycle - probably somewhere between 5 and 10 
degrees -  and the stabilised condition. But the initial switch of zero volts 
must be with zero current.

73

Peter G3RZP


========================================
 Message Received: Feb 10 2014, 06:24 PM
 From: donroden@hiwaay.net
 To: amps@contesting.com
 Cc: 
 Subject: Re: [Amps] Solid State Relays Again
 
 Quoting Peter Voelpel <dj7ww@t-online.de>:
 
 > I guess with transformers the relay should switch in on the peak voltage.
 > As current peaks 90 degree behind that should be the best moment with least
 > surge current.
 >
 > 73
 > Peter
 
 
 
 But if you switch at zero voltage, the current is at zero 90 degrees later...
 
 So you have at least 1/4 of a cycle where there is minimum IxE  
 supplied to the load.
 
 Don W4DNR
 
 _______________________________________________
 Amps mailing list
 Amps@contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
 
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>