Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] L-C-L vs C-L-C

To: amps <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] L-C-L vs C-L-C
From: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@gmail.com>
Reply-to: ka4inm@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 23:26:04 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
chris@chrishays.com
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 6:54 PM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: [Amps] L-C-L vs C-L-C

Another reason I suspect is the C-L-C pi network allows both the variable
capacitor rotors to be at ground potential.  This lets the shaft be at
ground potential making for a safer control that is not affected by the
proximity of the human operator's hand. No insulated shaft required either!

I am having a lot of trouble visualizing a C-L-C (usually called a "T" not a Pi)
network where any part of either capacitor is grounded, please explain more.

--
  Ron  KA4INM - Youvan's corollary:
                Every action results in unwanted side effects.
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>