Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] BLF188xr amp

To: "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] BLF188xr amp
From: "Scott, Christopher" <chris.scott@wku.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:33:45 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I should clarify my question; my intent is to do everything practical to 
protect the FETs - overtemp, overcurrent, and excessive reflected power.  The 
usual location for the reflectometer is after the low pass filter - this 
provides an accurate indication of the load match.  But if the wrong band LPF 
is selected, this does not protect the fets. 

Logically one could move the reflectometer to between the fet output 
transformer and the input of the low pass filter.  This would protect the fets, 
but would always show about a 2:1 SWR due to the high 3rd harmonic (-10 to -12) 
reflecting back from the filter.  Perhaps this is the best solution - and maybe 
up the reverse power threshold to normalize it.

Or, modify the LPFs with a "diplexer" arm that shunts 3rd harmonic to a small 
50 ohm load.  This would have the effect of reducing the reflection to the fets 
as well ...

Chris Scott
W4NEQ

 


-----------------------------------------------------
But my question relates to swr mismatch protection.  My project is a 2 x 
Blf188XR 1200 watt amp, 80/40/20, for ssb service.  I've ordered a 4z4rb board, 
and got my two Fets for 129 euros each from 
www.pcs-electronics.com<http://www.pcs-electronics.com>.   I spent $190 on a 
0.75" x 6" x 12" copper heat spreader, and it will be mated to a large aluminum 
forced air heat sink.  As much as I hate to do it, it seems that soldering the 
fets in is best to keep case temps reasonable.  That makes one doubly worried 
about blowing the fets.

They brag about 65:1 swr survivability, but this is pulsed.  Clearly a post LPF 
reflectometer ref sample is necessary to shut it down with a poor match, say 
above 2:1. But I see another pitfall; the switched LPFs being set to the wrong 
band.

So, is the best solution adding another reflectometer after the output 
transformer and prior to the filter to protect against that?  With an expected 
third harmonic being 10-12 dB down at this point, the threshold might need to 
be high, like 5:1 ...

Chris Scott
W4NEQ
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com<mailto:Amps@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



--
     4Z4 RB
Baruch Zilbershatz
 Ha-Shibolim 18
Nitzanay-Oz 42836
Israel



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>