Thank you for the excellent information.
de n0yvy Steve
>From k2mm@MasPar.COM (John Zapisek K2MM) Mon Oct 9 23:20:25 1995
From: k2mm@MasPar.COM (John Zapisek K2MM) (John Zapisek K2MM)
Subject: Oops! CQP E-Mail Log Correction
Message-ID: <9510092220.AA22931@greylock.local>
Here's a correction to my previous posting re CQP e-log submisison.
> Note that there were two e-mail addresses circulated for logs:
>
> cqp-1995@tgv.com
^^^^^^^
> nccc-cqp@maspar.com
Bzzzt. The first one should be:
cqp-1995@kb.org
Mail sent to the tgv.com address will probably bounce. In that
case, just re-send to the correct address. Duh.
Sorry for the confusion. 73. --John/K2MM
>From k7fr@ncw.net (Gary Nieborsky) Tue Oct 10 00:09:45 1995
From: k7fr@ncw.net (Gary Nieborsky) (Gary Nieborsky)
Subject: TL-922 and CW
Message-ID: <199510092309.QAA15922@bing.ncw.net>
Thought I sent this out but got a rude error message back.
Is there a really good reason why you can't run a 922 on CW with the MODE SW
set to the SSB position??
If so, is there a good fix for it.....new amp is out of the question, yl
just bought new furniture.
Thanks,
Gary K7FR
>From Dick Dievendorff" <dieven@almaden.ibm.com Tue Oct 10 00:25:11 1995
From: Dick Dievendorff" <dieven@almaden.ibm.com (Dick Dievendorff)
Subject: Contest exchange?
Message-ID: <9510091625.ZM21872@penguin.almaden.ibm.com>
How much do you send when correcting an incomplete or busted call?
On CW, my relatively recent practice has been:
Me: CQ TEST AA6MC
Him: K1ABC
Me: K2ABC 5NN3 (or whatever)
Him: K1ABC K1ABC 5NN5
Me: K1 TU AA6MC
or on SSB:
Him: (garble) ABC
Me: ending ABC, 59 3
Him: K1ABC 59 5
Me: K1, thanks, QRZ?
I'd like to survey the forum community's practice in this area. I have in the
past tended to use the CT AUTOCORRECT feature which will resend the entire call
on CW, but recently in an attempt to speed things up I've started to manually
send just the part I got wrong, prefix or suffix. But a contester who I
greatly respect discouraged this practice, in essence saying that I hadn't
completed the required exchange. Another contester I greatly respect
abbreviates this even further, as:
Me: (garble) ABC
Me: ABC, 59 3
Him: K1ABC 59 5
Me: AA6MC
What do you say? Please send your opinion to me, I'll tabulate the votes and
share the summarized results.
Dick Dievendorff, AA6MC
>From long@apex.ece.ucsb.edu (Stephen Long) Mon Oct 9 23:50:20 1995
From: long@apex.ece.ucsb.edu (Stephen Long) (Stephen Long)
Subject: CQP: AC6T & N8SR
Message-ID: <v01510100ac9f57713f94@[128.111.186.26]>
some cqp scores for the summary:
n8sr/6 (@n6dx) LAX 1054 x 55 173910 all cw
ac6t (@n6vr) VENT 1657 x 56 225008
missed hawaii and alaska!
>From CTA <0006806220@mcimail.com> Tue Oct 10 00:29:00 1995
From: CTA <0006806220@mcimail.com> (CTA)
Subject: CQP - WA6CTA
Message-ID: <70951009232907/0006806220DC2EM@MCIMAIL.COM>
California QSO Party 1995
Call: WA6CTA County: Marin
Category: Single Operator
MODE QSO QSO PTS MULTS
CW 477 1431 0
SSB 342 684 0
-----------------------------------------
Totals 819 2115 54 = 114,210
All reports sent were 59(9), unless otherwise noted.
Equipment Description:
Ten Tec OMNI VI, Alpha 89, Force 12 6 element, Verticals
Club Affiliation: Nothern California Contest Club
Comments:
What happened to propagation?? Almost no one on 160, either!
Conditions were el-stinko!!I can't believe I missed Hawaii again
(plus a few others!). I even turned the beam West and called CQ,
to no avail - just worked lots of 5's off the back! Still, lots
of fun. I had some great runs. This is ALWAYS a great contest.
I hope I can put in the full 24 hours next year (this year was
about 15). At least the station performed flawlessly!
/
|