One comment I've seen repeated over the years is that the better
single-ops don't use packet, while the SOAs are a different class of
operator and/or station; hence, the better scores in SO vs SOA. This may be
true in individual cases, but I don't believe it's the rule.
Also, it's very easy to say, as a single op, "gee, I'd definitely do
better with packet." To those who say it, have you tried it?
Personally, when I operate SOA, I try to ignore packet as much as
possible, especially the first 24h. It's very easy to kill a good
run by chasing packet spots. This can hinder the score more than help
it.
One solution would be to permit all to use packet. It would eliminate
the "is this guy cheating by using packet" question that keeps
popping up. And, it would answer the question "are the SO ops the
real macho men/champions they say they are."
73Barry
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@voicenet.com
Newtown, PA FRC alternate: barry@w2up.wells.com
>From aa7bg@initco.net (AA7BG Matt Trott) Fri Sep 27 19:39:27 1996
From: aa7bg@initco.net (AA7BG Matt Trott) (AA7BG Matt Trott)
Subject: Sum:Yagi Resonance
Message-ID: <199609271839.MAA02175@zeus.initco.net>
Thanks to all for the responses regarding resonant frequency changes as
antennas are raised above ground. The short and sweet of it is (for those
that don't know...I didn't):
The higher the antenna, the higher the resonant freek due to the
decreased capacitive coupling with ground.
73, Perris Ittik
>From n6nd@n6nd.wanet.com (Rick Craig, N6ND) Fri Sep 27 20:03:33 1996
From: n6nd@n6nd.wanet.com (Rick Craig, N6ND) (Rick Craig, N6ND)
Subject: Multiple-Choice Packet-in-Contests Quiz
Message-ID: <3.0b15.32.19960927190234.0069c3f4@mailhub1.wanet.net>
I believe every "large, popular international DX contest" has in its published
(or unpublished in the case of CQWW) rules that the decisions of the judges
(or contest committee) are final and that all participants are bound by those
decisions. If you can make a good case that a single op station is using
packet spots to find multipliers, then his log should be reclassified to
SOA. What's the problem with that?? If the committee (or judges) doesn't
have the balls to enforce the contest rules, then we are all beating a dead
horse.
I don't think it's that difficult to determine if a station is using packet
spots, the cluster sysops will be glad to provide a log of the cluster spots
made during a contest. A comparison of the times of the spots and times the
station S/P's a mult will reveal the patterns fairly quickly.
Frankly, Dick, you're starting to sound like a late 50's AMer complaining
about the Donald Duck signals on the band. DX Clusters are here to stay and
people are going to continue to use them in contests because they are having
fun doing so. I think it's time for you to lighten up and have some fun
yourself instead of worrying about whether there were one or two shooters on
the grassy knoll.
73 Rick, N6ND
Rick Craig, N6ND
n6nd@n6nd.wanet.com
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable
from magic. -Clarke's Third Law
>From dave@egh.com (David Clemons) Fri Sep 27 20:31:14 1996
From: dave@egh.com (David Clemons) (David Clemons)
Subject: Multiple-Choice Packet-in-Contests Quiz/The Real Question (LONG)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960927152842.23703A-100000@newman.egh.com>
Hi,
The choices here leave a log checker/judge truly between the rock
and a hard place. The fact is that cheating has been going on about as
long as the human race has been around. More to the point, some of us
have probably heard of incidents where a big contester's voice was recognized
on a 2 meter repeater begging for more DX spots (before packet was invented).
Anyone who has read the manual for their TNC can figure out how to get packet
spots without anyone else being able to prove it. Last, but not least,
although almost everyone knows how to do it, the majority of us not only do
not cheat but also would in some degree be angered by getting beat out by a
cheater. Also, I don't believe that legalizing crime ever had a positive
effect on society, so I don't go along with the idea that we should just
combine the SO and SOA classes because some SO ops really are operating SOA.
I have to say that I am impressed with the accuracy of the log
checking software by N6AA (and I think N6TR is involved too?). I have a
graduate degree in CS and consider myself a competent software engineer type,
but imagining the amount of work involved in this sort of analysis gives me
the shivers. My hat is off to you guys.
A parallel issue is the use of uniques in checking logs. I have
never been a fan of the idea of disqualification due to excessive uniques
but have of late realized that large enough databases can give a real
good picture of a person's logging accuracy. At this time, I can probably
be talked into its merits if the percentage is chosen to be high enough
that genuine uniques are not the cause of disqualification. From figures
I've seen, perhaps somewhere between 10%-15% might provide such safety.
Thus I have to say that I might also embrace the idea of
reclassifying logs if it can be shown that, without a reasonable doubt, a
particular op has used packet. The reasonable doubt can only be eliminated
by using a high enough threshold of probable packet QSOs in order to avoid
wrong conclusions about the particular operator. I have no idea of what
constitutes such a safe threshold, but I do know that as a SO I have been
S&P'ing and stumbled across a choice DX call just seconds before it hit some
packet network(s) - my AGC made it evident. I would really hate to be
wrongly accused and reclassified on the basis of honest S&P's which
coincidentally were spotted by someone else.
I think you can sign me up for choice #5 (reclassification) if ample
assurances can be made that the threshold is high enough to protect the
innocent.
73, Dave Clemons K1VUT
>From ON7SS@dma.be (Marc Domen) Fri Sep 27 20:15:43 1996
From: ON7SS@dma.be (Marc Domen) (Marc Domen)
Subject: UBA CONTEST RULES 1997
Message-ID: <199609271915.VAA14859@www.dma.be>
--=====================_843885063==_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
--=====================_843885063==_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
UBA DX CONTEST 1997
Rules for non ON stations
The UBA has the honour to announce that this contest will be
challenged under the Patronage of the EC Commission, responsible
for Communication, Information and Culture.
The 10th EUROPEAN COMMUNITY TROPHY will be awarded to the highest
scoring EC member station from both the CW and SSB Class B compe-
tition.
______________________________________________________________
1. Purpose:
To contact as many Belgian and other amateurs as possible
and to provide a way to achieve the WABP and the EC Awards
in the "UBA Contest".
2. Periods :
13:00 UTC Saturday to 13:00 UTC Sunday.
SSB 25 - 26 January 1997.
CW 22 - 23 February 1997.
3. Classes :
A. Single Operator Single Band (A10, A15, A20, A40, A80).
B. Single Operator Multi Band (5 bands).
C. Multi Operator Single Transmitter (5 bands).
D. QRP 5 watt output, as class B.
E. SWL, as class B (Rules under item 10).
4. Bands :
On 10,15, 20, 40 and 80m. The use of the IARU Region 1
recommended contest frequencies is mandatory in this
contest:
SSB : 3.600-3.650; 3.700-3.800; 7.040-7.100; 14.125-14.300;
21.175-21.350 and 28.400-28.700 MHz.
CW : 3.500-3.560; 7.000-7.035; 14.000-14.060; 21.000-21.080
and 28.000-28.070 MHz.
5. Contest Call and exchange :
- CW "TEST UBA"; SSB "CQ UBA".
- Exchange: RS(T) + serial number starting from 001.
Note that Belgian stations give their province ab-
breviation which is a mandatory part of the
exchange (e.g. 59001/AN).
6. Scoring :
- Each QSO with a Belgian station counts 10 points.
- Each QSO with another EC member stations as listed below
counts 3 points.
- QSO's with any other station outside the EC counts 1 point.
7. Multipliers per band :
- All Belgian provinces : AN, BW, HT, LB, LG, NM, LU, OV, VB
and WV. The region of Brussels : BR
- All Belgian prefixes e.g. ON4, ON5, ON6, ON7, ON8, ON9, OT6,
OS4, etc, etc....
- The following DXCC countries from the European Community:
CT, CU, DL, EA, EA6, EI, F, G, GD, GI, GJ, GM, GU, GW, I,
IS, LX, OE, OH, OH0, OJ0, OZ, PA, SM, SV, SV5, SV9, SY and
TK.
8. Final score :
Total QSO points (from all bands) times the total
number of multiplier points (from all bands).
9. Special Conditions :
- The use of DX-Cluster facilities is permitted.
- 10 minute rule: A station must remain for at least 10
minutes on a specific band. The starting time on a new band
is not necessarely the time of the first QSO on that band,
it can also be the time of the last QSO on the previous band
(listening time on the new band, prior to the first contact
is accepted).
10. Logs :
Each log must include a summary sheet showing the detailed
scoring information (QSO's, points an multipliers per band.
Use the appropriate designation to mark your entry Class
(A10, A15, A20, A40, A80, B, C, D, E). The log summary sheet
shall contain the following signed declaration : "I declare
that all contest rules and all the rules and regulations for
amateur radio operations in my country have been observed
and adhered to. I accept the decisions of the Contest
Committee". The IARU Region 1 standard format sheets are
recommended.
Remarks :
Computer logs: Computer logs on 5" 1/4 or 3" 1/2 diskettes
can only be accepted if the file format is ASCII. One QSO
per record is mandatory (ending with CR/LF) for computer
processing. The name of the file will be MYCALL.LOG (MYCALL
being your own call). Logs prouced by CT (K1EA) are accepted
in an ASCII format. We prefer the file MYCALL.LOG of EI5DI
or the logs generated by the ARI Contest programm as these
are specially written for this contest.
A selection of pictures of operators in action will be
published with the results. Please send your comments with
your contest log.
All logs must be postmarked not later than 30 days after the
contest. Late logs will not be considered for the
competition. The logs must be send to :
UBA HF MANAGER
CARINE RAMON, ON7LX
BRUGGESTEENWEG 77
B-8755 RUISELEDE
BELGIUM
SWL RULES :
Only stations taking part in the Contest may be logged for
scoring purposes. Logs should show in columns: Time (UTC),
callsign of "Station Heard", complete exchange sent by this
station, callsign of station being worked, a RS(T) report on
"Station Heard" at SWL's QTH, new multiplier and points
claimed. If both sides of a contest contact are heard they
may be claimed as separate stations and the callsigns have
to appear in the "Station Heard" column.
A station may only appear once per band as station heard. In
the column "Station Worked" the same station may not be
logged more than 10 times per band.
12. Awards.
The stations having sent US $ 5.00 with their log will
receive the results by direct mail.
THE QUICKEST WAY TO RECEIVE THE RESULTS IS TO MENTION YOUR
AX25 PACKET BBS IN YOUR LOG.
Awards will be sen to the highest scoring stations from each
class in each country and W, VE, PY, ZL, JA and VK call area
provided they have logged at least 40 valid contacts. Other
participants receive a certificate when 40 valid contacts
are logged.
The EC TROPHIES go to the EC winners of class B of both the
CW an the Phone contest.
13. Penalties and disqualification :
Penalties:
- Incomplete or incorrect exchange: the QSO will count
for zero points, but no additional penalty will be
applied.
- Deduction of 10 times QSO value for any unmarked
duplicate contact.
Disqualification:
- For cheating, imaginary logging and clear, repetitive
and intentional violation of the contest rules.
- If the total amount of penalty points (see above)
amounts to more than 2 % of the submitted score, the
participant will be disqualified.
--=====================_843885063==_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
**********************************************
* Amateur Radio Station ON7SS *
* Marc Domen UBA HF Contest Manager *
* Ferd.Coosemansstraat 32 *
* B - 2600 Berchem (Antwerpen) BELGIUM *
* Tel:03-218.52.60 *
* AX25 Packet BBS ON7SS @ON1ANR.#AN.BEL.EU *
* Internet ON7SS@dma.be *
**********************************************
--=====================_843885063==_--
>From kitchens@earthlink.net (John Kitchens) Fri Sep 27 20:49:24 1996
From: kitchens@earthlink.net (John Kitchens) (John Kitchens)
Subject: socal dx cluster
Message-ID: <324C2FC4.16B9@earthlink.net>
Ong story, but I lost the freqs for the the Southern California area DX
Packet Clusters, specifically in Los Angeles and Ventura County areas. I
used to have a map, but can't find it, and the memory in the radio died.
Please send email, or fax at 213-847-5458.
Thanks
John, NS6X
>From cshinn@connect.net (charles d. shinn) Sat Sep 28 00:09:21 1996
From: cshinn@connect.net (charles d. shinn) (charles d. shinn)
Subject: New Kenwood Radio Announced
Message-ID: <01BBAC8E.73AEF540@a2p03.connect.net>
Good news gang! Kenwood has announced a new radio today- the Kenwood =
TS-570D. From the ad slicks it really looks like a FB rig. This radio =
was obviously designed with the new distribution and sales channels in =
mind. Sharing the front panel with a very nice weighted optically =
encoded VFO knob is a 40 position detented switch assembly enabling =
quick QSY's from HF to CB.
Although it would give the appearance of dual VFO and receiver mixed =
audio, alas it comes with neither. However, included at no additional =
charge is a ROGER "BEEP" button and some new enticing features only =
found in this radios DSP circuitry. Along with standard features of =
bandwidth and noise cancelling come a new digital ECHO and digitally =
mastered waterfall background sounds for taking over that bothersome =
QRM'ed channel.The waterfall emulator has its own PTT control so as not =
to wear out your fingers.Yes gang. this radio has enabled XMIT on 10mhz =
for those wishing a higher profile in their radio life.These radios =
should be in your dealers soon so call now!
>From cshinn@connect.net (charles d. shinn) Sat Sep 28 00:30:05 1996
From: cshinn@connect.net (charles d. shinn) (charles d. shinn)
Subject: CQWW CW
Message-ID: <01BBAC91.2780ABC0@a2p03.connect.net>
The Top Ten reasons why I cant make the Top Ten in the CQWW CW:
#10 You sign 6E5EBE with a hand key.
|