I briefly enjoyed doublet callsign S57MM and Mickey Mouse spelling was always
appreciated. I am sure Bill's K4AAA gets thru but how about Dave's K1TTT?
The best triplet I heard recently was W3EEE with guaranteed 100% CW copy...
73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU.
>From JEH@on.mobitel.telia.se (Jan-Erik Holm) Mon Feb 10 10:05:47 1997
From: JEH@on.mobitel.telia.se (Jan-Erik Holm) (Jan-Erik Holm)
Subject: WPX CW Weekend
Message-ID: <D139IRX262QU*/R=A1/R=ROONA/U=JEH/@MHS.stoa.mobitel.telia.se>
Yes I think it would be a good idea to move it, maybe to last weekend
of April. Activity from the US is usually very low in the WPX CW and
it aparently could be due to the choice of weekend.
73 de Jim SM2EKM
>From Karl-Heinz.Merscher@stud.uni-bayreuth.de (Karl-Heinz Merscher) Mon Feb
>10 10:30:24 1997
From: Karl-Heinz.Merscher@stud.uni-bayreuth.de (Karl-Heinz Merscher)
(Karl-Heinz Merscher)
Subject: Amp reflector?
Message-ID: <199702100930.KAA10681@btr0xe.hrz.uni-bayreuth.de>
Hi folks,
are there any further details available? Who will be hosting this
reflector (VE7TCP??) ??
I'm looking for a linear starter project, e. g. building a "simple
amp" with a single 3-500 Z. This will be nearly a QRP project
nowadays but a good attempt to become a little bit louder, Hi Hi
vy 73 de DL6RDE / AA1KD, Charlie
> RDTALBERT@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > In my personal opinion, creation of a QRO reflector is a great idea. Any
> > other support for this?
> > Roy
>
> > You got my vote / constuction tips etc....Alright
> > 73
> > de
> > ve6nap@oanet.com
>
> Great idea! Maybe I finaly can build myself a decent amplifier and be heard.
> 73 de Jim SM2EKM
>
>
>
>From JEH@on.mobitel.telia.se (Jan-Erik Holm) Mon Feb 10 10:39:56 1997
From: JEH@on.mobitel.telia.se (Jan-Erik Holm) (Jan-Erik Holm)
Subject: Triplet callsigns
Message-ID: <D144IRX2AH1V*/R=A1/R=ROONA/U=JEH/@MHS.stoa.mobitel.telia.se>
>I briefly enjoyed doublet callsign S57MM and Mickey Mouse spelling was always
>appreciated. I am sure Bill's K4AAA gets thru but how about Dave's K1TTT?
>The best triplet I heard recently was W3EEE with guaranteed 100% CW copy...
>73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU.
Not that I might have anything to do with it and it might not be a contest
matter either but I sure cant understand why these fellows did dump their
old calls. Dont see anything wrong with either KY1H or KM9P.
73 de Jim SM2EKM and KA1FYD (sure killers of c/s)
>From aixxo004@cmu.chiangmai.ac.th (Jumsai Janhom-HS1NIV/5) Tue Feb 11
>00:20:12 1997
From: aixxo004@cmu.chiangmai.ac.th (Jumsai Janhom-HS1NIV/5) (Jumsai
Janhom-HS1NIV/5)
Subject: CQ WPX CW Weekend
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.970210170450.23718A-100000@cmu>
On Mon, 10 Feb 1997 ve2zp@bbs.ve3jf.ampr.org wrote:
> To return to the subject at hand, we all know conditions are usually poor in
> late May. Re-scheduling at a month earlier improves our chances of having
> better conditions, and better conditions means more fun for everyone.
>
> 73, Dave VE2ZP/VE9CB
> Packet: VE2ZP@VA3TCP.#EON.ON.CAN.NOAM
> InterNet: ve2zp@va3tcp.ampr.org
Fellow,
Sure,the more good condition is the more fun.But I think ,for the
purpose of the contest I believe that it's not for only fun.A little bit
poor cdx is a reason to be afraid? Recall our memorize the past few year,
was it good cdx in the contests? Ham should prepare for all poor conditions.
Are the more fun and the good time for hamvention the reasons to re-sked
the folk?
Bye,73s
Log around the clock!!
packet: HS1NIV@N0ARY.#NOCAL.CA.USA.NOAM
|