Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL DX CW and assisted classes |
---|---|
From: | Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad) |
Date: | Tue Sep 2 17:56:44 1997 |
NO NO NO......I dont think Jim meant to have that thread started up again. I think he was pointing out that single op assisted is a legitimate competitive category, not that we need to get rid of regular single op!!! Using the logic below, you could say lets make single op and multi op the same class , since nearly everyone has a friend they could operate with, and this would eliminate cheating. (multi's pretending to be singles op) Tim - NU6S -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL DX CW and assisted classes, Tim Coad |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW and assisted classes, Kevin Drost |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL DX CW and assisted classes, Tim Coad |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Traveling to England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland, Alfred J. Frugoli |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |