CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] WRONG! (No matter how you do it, I still l

Subject: [CQ-Contest] WRONG! (No matter how you do it, I still l
From: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA)
Date: Sun Mar 22 07:15:40 1998
On 21 Mar 98, Jimmy Weierich wrote:

> If a station makes a large number of zero point QSO's and follows a
> practice of not logging them, as some here are implying is done, would it
> not be obvious to the log checkers (from the size of the .nil report and
> the lack of  zero point QSO's in the log) and be subject to penalty or
> disqualification?

Hey all you CQWW statisticians out there:

Should not the ratio of US/DX stations in the NIL file be similar to
the US/DX ratio in the log in a normal situation?  If there is a big
difference, say a larger ratio of US/DX in the NIL file compared to
the log, would that be indicative of a problem such as intentionally
failing to log the US-US QSOs?  I think so.

73 de Lee

--
Lee Hiers - AA4GA
Cornelia, GA
mailto:aa4ga@contesting.com   




--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] WRONG! (No matter how you do it, I still l, Lee Hiers, AA4GA <=