CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] SS CW Scoring Question

Subject: [CQ-Contest] SS CW Scoring Question
From: na2n@ifam.com (Greg Becker)
Date: Thu Jul 2 17:20:51 1998

Well, it's obvious to me that in order to get results one must bitch loudly.
Here goes...

The following was sent to ARRL HQ after the release of the 97 SSCW results.
After no fewer than 5 reminder messages and almost a month, a brief and
mostly unresponsive reply was received from Billy saying "gee, we can't
check everything, good luck next time..."

Let's see what the masses think. Opinions?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Greg Becker, J.D., Ph.D.   na2n@ifam.com
IFAM - Ideas For American Manufacturers
J.W., Rondout #343 F&AM





-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Michie [mailto:ky2j@ibm.net]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 1998 3:10 AM
To: kr1r@arrl.org
Cc: k2wr@njdxa.org
Subject: SS CW Scoring Question


Hi Billy,

While reviewing the November Sweepstakes CW results I noticed something
about the scoring that seems wrong.  In the multi-op category, it
looks like only the top 12 "High Claimed Scores" were cross-checked
and had "reductions" taken.  I believe that this practice could invalidate
the results (at least for some division leaders).  For example, the
Hudson Division had three close multi-op scores where only one station
(NA2N+KY2J) received a score reduction.  The other two stations AA2FB and
K2TW, were apprently not cross-checked.  (Yes, this did alter the
standings).

At the bottom of this note I've attached a comparison of the top 25
multi-ops "high claimed" vs. "published" scores.

Please understand, I am not questioning the point reductions assessed
to the 12 top scores.  However, I do think that (at a minimum) each
section/division leader should be determined using the same criteria.

Could you please re-evaluate the scores for NA2N, AA2FB, and K2TW.
One of these stations was the Hudson Division multi-op winner ...
but, I don't think it has been determined yet.
If I had to guess ... the K2TW+W2GD team is pretty tough competition.

I think this practice could also invalidate some "Division Records".

Thanks and 73,

    Bob Michie (KY2J)
    ky2j@ibm.net

Comparison of High Claimed vs. Printed multi-op scores.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Call                Claimed   Printed
K4OJ                217,882   217,408   -474        SFL
K8LX                204,768   197,974  -6794        MI
KO7X                204,136   203,346   -790        UT
W9JA                203,030   195,920  -7110        WI
AB0S                199,836   188,136 -11700        KS
K5MDX               197,500   192,760  -4740        MS
W3GH                197,500   189,916  -7694        WPA
K0RWL               193,392   182,806 -10586        MO
N6VR                190,864   171,272 -19592        SB
KT0R                181,226   172,566  -8660        MN
K6RC                180,436   175,696  -4740        SV
NA2N                173,800   166,374  -7426        ENY    Hudson Div.
AA2FB               172,694   172,694      0        NLI    Hudson Div.
K2TW                170,640   170,640      0        NNJ    Hudson Div.
N6KI                170,008   170,008      0        SDG
N6ZS                166,532   166,532      0        SV
W4RM                164,794   164,794      0        VA
K4LT                163,688   163,688      0        KY
K6RCC               162,266   162,266      0        SCV
K7VS                158,948   158,948      0        OR
W6UE                155,064   155,064      0        LAX
K8JM                150,732   150,732      0        MI
W6BIP               150,574   150,574      0        SF
K2DS                148,520   148,520      0        ENY
K2NNY               146,150   146,150      0        NNY




--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>