At 08:22 AM 8/7/99 -0400, Dan Robbins wrote:
>One interesting thing would be for John to go to a rare spot, say A5 or
>even the considerably less rare A35. He should S&P roughly the same
>number of guys in the contest and await the UBN reports to see how much
>his NIL rate has dropped. Since we've all been told that log checking
>transcends geographical bias, the improvement in his NILs could come
>about only because of genuine operator improvement, right? From K5 to
>A5 to A-1.
I disagree. His NIL improvement will come because people need the mult,
and will try harder to copy it correctly, rather than not logging it to
avoid the 3 QSO penalty if they're not 100% sure of the call.
73 - Jim AD1C
--
Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> http://jjr.ne.mediaone.net/
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|