Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Packet vs. No Packet Contesting |
---|---|
From: | W0uo@cs.com (W0uo@cs.com) |
Date: | Sun Feb 24 06:38:37 2002 |
Guy, Well said!! If there's an advantage it is very small. Its always been interesting to me that a single op with a multiplier orientation will usually be beat by a single op with a rate orientation. At least in my experience, go for the rate and the multipliers seem take care of themselves. By its nature, packet assistance implies a multiplier orientation. 73 de Jim W0UO/5 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CQ Helsinki, Finland, Rick Dougherty |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] B-Low 1.835?, Rick Bullon |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Packet vs. No Packet Contesting, Guy Olinger, K2AV |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] W/VEs spotting W/VEs, k8cc |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |