CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] FW: Spotting

Subject: [CQ-Contest] FW: Spotting
From: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Sat Mar 9 09:06:05 2002
Al is right on target with this issue.

Such pre-arrangements are not "legal".

Pre-arranging for this type of "assistance" crosses the line into
"multi-operator" area.  As most of these other operators are not physically
at the subject station, even this is a violation of the rules.

If they are somehow considered part of a multi-operator or assisted
station's operation (although remote, and ignoring the above for a moment),
self-spotting is also prohibited.

All of this type of activity extends the number of operators and geographic
spread of these operations.  There's nothing in the rules to permit it.

" Paul, K9PG,  is a great operator. He doesn't need this "help" from the
peanut gallery."

Nor the bad press I would imagine.

N5NJ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Al Crespo" <nh7a@arrl.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 12:51 AM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] FW: Spotting


>
> Pre-contest publicity is allowable. Friends aggressively spotting a
> station during the contest is an entirely different matter. Any evidence
> ZF2MM  requested this, no. Should this be encouraged, no.
> Paul, K9PG,  is a great operator. He doesn't need this "help" from the
> peanut gallery.
> What if many  members  of a large club  decide that since one of them is
> going to be in CQWW and wants to win  for the World , then the members
> will get on and work that station. No problem.
> However, what if there is an agreement that all the members  will spot
> that station during the contest?
> Does it not create a beast called  single operator assisted ?
> 73, Al
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>