I don't think it's worth a poll. IMHO If someone can only get on for 12 or 24
hrs out of 48...........if they're in contesting........they'll operate the time
they have available.(the story of my life) I don't feel there should be any
additions to classes or op times.
73,
Zig KM9M
Robert Shohet wrote:
> The questions are....
>
> 1) With a 24 hour category, will more people (who would otherwise quit or
> not
> ever turn on a radio) get on and operate for more total hours, than other
> already participating people
> operate for less hours? I don't think anyone knows the answer to that!
>
> 2) Does Bill, W4AN, and eHAM.net think this question is worthy of a poll?
> I think the only way for anyone to have any idea of the answer to question
> #1, is for
> people to vote their operating preference as follows:
>
> Question1: If there was a 24 hour category, would you operate more hours
> than you operate now?
> (Yes or NO)
>
> Question 2: How many hours do you typically operate this contest now?
>
> A) 1 - 6 hrs
> B) 6 - 12 hrs
> C) 12 - 24 hrs
> D) 24 - 30 hrs
> F) 30 - 36 hrs
> F) 36 or more
>
> Question 3: How many hours would you operate this contest with a 24 hour
> category?
> A) 1 - 6 hrs
> B) 6 -12 hrs
> C) 12-24 hrs
> D) 24 -30 hrs
> E) 30-36 hrs
> F) 36 or more
>
> Realizing that this is only for informational purposes and not a scientific
> study, I think that a poll
> might give some idea as to whether or not there is MEANINGFUL interest in
> such a category.
>
> The questions offered are only suggestions.
>
> I personally don't feel strongly one way or the other about this, but in the
> interests of lessening the number
> of future posts by impassioned people, I suggest that we provide a forum by
> which we can attempt to get
> a more objective and measurable response.
>
> 73
> Bob KQ2M
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|