Interesting question. Our moderator has quite a bit of experience as
the
man doing the log checking. He's going to be quite sensitive to the
issues
that face the sponsors. Can we, as a forum, expect that our best
interests
will be discharged if advocacy for the rights of entrants vs. sponsors
will
not be allowed? That would certainly lead to one-sided discussions.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sylvan Katz" <jskatz@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:14 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Detecting Packet Use - process and techniques
> In response to a recent posting I speculated on how the CQ WW
software for
> detecting packet use might work and why it probably can only be used
to
> detect blatant cheaters. The basic technique was described on this
reflector
> in a previous thread.
>
> My posting was bounced by the list moderator in which he stated " I
don't
> think it's a good idea to post comments on how someone might get
around
> (break) the rules. Questioning the process is fine."
>
> In keeping with the moderator's comments about questioning the
process I
> would like to ask if a frank, open and uncensored discussion about
the
> techniques that are or may be used by CQ WW is valid topic for this
> reflector?
>
> ... Sylvan
>
> Sylvan Katz, VE5ZX
> Saskatoon, SK
> http://www.dynamicforesight.com/~ve5zx
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
> http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|