CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW question

To: "CQ Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW question
From: "Hans K0HB" <K-Zero-HB@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: K-Zero-HB@earthlink.net
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 00:23:14 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>





> [Original Message]
> From: Chuck <discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com>

> My question had more to do with the impact of
> LoTW on individuals QSL'ing via snail mail versus
> just LoTW contacts or 'E'-QSL's. (Don't want to
> run afoul of the 'EQSL' (tm) PATENT WARNINGS!

Noticed at the eQSL web site that they have a new service

   " We have added a new Contest Room to our 
      Chat facility, so you can find people you want
      to work during contests."

Wonder if contest sponsors might want to post a watch there to enforce the
"solicitation of contacts by non-radio means" clause found in most contest
rules?

Ward, do I get any credit for that eGripe? :-)

73, de Hans, K0HB
--
  http://home.earthlink.net/~k0hb





---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>