Of course she's not. McDermott Will is most likely
ghost writing it and they're simply placing the
association's name on it. This is standard practice
in lobbying regulatory agencies utilizing ad hoc or
semi-permanent lobbying groups.
Rich KE3F
--- Original Message ---
From: "Jim Talens" <jtalens@rcn.com>
To: "CQ-CONTEST REFL" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] BPL -
>In my local exchange area in McLean, VA, Verizon is
installing fiber to the
>curb with expected commencement of "bandwidth on
demand" service at the end
>of the calendar year. I am not sure how the pricing
works on this, but it
>likely would be competitive with in-place Cox Cable
broadband service. I
>now have 28.8 kbps dial-up so am a likely candidate
for Verizon's service
>given I don't subscribe to cable. So BPL is a non-
starter here, certainly.
>The guy from our power company who stops by every few
weeks (as recently as
>yesterday!) to check on my QRN level from power lines
says Dominion Power is
>not hot on BPL, and he personally thinks it's a non-
starter. However, he is
>not the decisionmaker at his company.
>
>Several guys who have sent emails to UTC (parent
industry association of the
>BPL advocacy group known as UPLC - see www.uplc.org
and www.utc.org) have
>received highly non-responsive propagandist emails in
return. I am one of
>those. In reaction, I have also sent follow-up
messages to the CEO and
>General Counsel of UTC suggesting that they are not
helping their own
>advocacy by dispatching ill-considered and
inflammatory factually erroneous
>public releases. They have not responded. But
certainly Mary Patterson,
>the public relations person whose name appears on
UPLC releases, is not
>writing this stuff alone. Of course, anyone making
decisions in government
>or elsewhere presumably is knowledgeable enough to
see past some of this
>garbage. On the other hand, we need only look at
other areas of political
>gullibility to see we cannot rely on that
assumption. Letting these BPL
>garbage-heads (a sophisticated legal term) know they
can't get away without
>negative feedback seems worthwhile.
>
>Jim, N3JT
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pvrc-bounces@mailman.qth.net
>> [mailto:pvrc-bounces@mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of
Jim Jordan K4QPL
>> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 2:43 AM
>> To: K3FT; CQ-CONTEST REFL; PVRC LIST
>> Subject: Re: [PVRC] Small victory for anti-BPL fans
>>
>>
>> I'm even more pleased to see the market is also
destroying the
>> need for BPL.
>> In addition to the cable and DSL options for
consumers, Nextel
>> has launched
>> a wireless broadband service with good coverage and
reasonable cost in the
>> Raleigh-Durham area. Don't know how good it is, but
hopefully it is the
>> picture of things to come. I see no reason why this
method won't
>> eventually
>> achieve the coverage of cell phones and relegate
the spectrum-polluting,
>> clunky, and totally unnecessary BPL to the scrap
heap. I can only say how
>> thankful I am that BPL has come so late to a
crowded market up against
>> broadband providers who are still innovating
practical technologies.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Jim, K4QPL
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "K3FT" <k3ft@starpower.net>
>> To: "CQ-CONTEST REFL" <cq-
contest@contesting.com>; "PVRC LIST"
>> <pvrc@mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 7:00 PM
>> Subject: [PVRC] Small victory for anti-BPL fans
>>
>>
>> See ARRL website link
>> http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/06/28/2/?nc=1
>>
>> This tells story of Cedar Rapids, IA BPL test bed
where supplier (Alliant)
>> is pulling the plug. Read the story, read between
the lines.
>> Draw your own conclusions. My take? Alliant ran
headlong into the
>> TECHNICAL REALITY and found it didn't match the
PUBLIC RELATIONS ILLUSIONS
>> they have been propounding.
>>
>> One small victory for HF.. one giant leap for
Reality!
>>
>> 73
>> K3FT
>> _______________________________________________
>> PVRC mailing list
>> PVRC@mailman.qth.net
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pvrc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PVRC mailing list
>> PVRC@mailman.qth.net
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pvrc
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-
contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|