Not quite single op, but the one transmitter does act
like a single op...
--- Original Message ---
From: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
To: "Bill Coleman" <aa4lr@arrl.net>, "Roy Maull"
<rmaull@charter.net>
CC: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Advantages not created equal
>Well, for one, Field Day.
>
>Rich NN3W
>
>--- Original Message ---
>From: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
>To: Roy Maull <rmaull@charter.net>
>CC: cq-contest@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Advantages not created equal
>
>>
>>On Aug 17, 2004, at 9:42 AM, Roy Maull wrote:
>>
>>> The ten minute rule was applied to the SO
>class to squash the
>>> "so called" SO2R advantage.
>>
>>What contest implements a 10 minute rule for single
>operators?
>>
>>> It originated for the MOST class with multiple
>radios to preclude
>>> their operating much like a MOMT station.
>>> Although the SO2R station was
>inconvenienced a bit by this
>>> rule, the true SO1R small station that primarily
>works S&P was the
>>> most severely impacted. It hampers the
flexibility
>needed to maximize
>>> the score by chasing mults from band to band as
>needed.
>>> I have always considered this the worst
>rule ever applied to
>>> the SO class.
>>
>>There's no need to limit the band changes for single
>operators. The
>>operator is the limitation, not band changes.
>>
>>
>>Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail:
>aa4lr@arrl.net
>>Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever
>fly!"
>> -- Wilbur Wright, 1901
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CQ-Contest mailing list
>>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-
>contest
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-
contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|