CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

FW: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spot analysis

To: <k1ttt@arrl.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: FW: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spot analysis
From: <jukka.klemola@Nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:27:49 +0200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of ext 
> David Robbins
> K1TTT
...
> Sure would be nice to get the ip address info back from DXSummit for
> these spotters. 
> Spotter       FromNode        Dx      Freq    Comment
> PY3GH         DXSummit        XQ4ZW   21064   ZONE 12
> JH1FSF        DXSummit        XQ4ZW   28024.9  
> UA3FJK        DXSummit        XQ4ZW   21064   CE 12
> PY6GT         DXSummit        XQ4ZW   21076   ZONE 12 !!
> UA3FHJ        DXSummit        XQ4ZW   21064   CE 12
> S51DI         S50CLX  XQ4ZW   28089.5  
> PY4FG         DXSummit        XQ4ZW   21082   Z 12
> W3BGH         DXSummit        XQ4ZW   21082   Z 12
> PY3RF         DXSummit        XQ4ZW   21064   ZONE 12
> OH2GV         DXSummit        XQ4ZW   21064   ZONE 12
> its interesting that most of the dxsummit spots had to be 
> sure you knew
> ce was zone 12.  Most contest spotters don't bother with a 
> comment like
> that so having a whole group like that is odd.  also, w3bgh 
> is not found
> in latest buckmaster cd.  also note that all the ones with 
> comments are
> exact integer frequencies, most cw spots have some variance around the
> real tx just due to how people tune them in.

This case seems pretty nice as OH2GV does not exist.


73,
Jukka OH6LI

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>