CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] The Perfect Contest

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>, "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The Perfect Contest
From: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:12:37 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
My guess:  If the casual contester had to register to play casually, that 
portion of the participation would drop to almost nothing.

73,
Rusty, na5tr


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Cc: <n3bb@mindspring.com>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The Perfect Contest


> Jim, N3BB, had originally suggested:
>
> > 5. Some portion of the exchange always should include a serial number,
>
> I've already commented on this, but after piddling around in the CQ WW SSB
> for a bit, it dawned on me that QSO rates do not have to drop by adding a
> serial number.  Rather, just get rid of the stinking bogus RS or RST in
> exchanges, because the last few hours confirmed what a total joke they
> are.  In fact, outright stupid.  Make that beyond stupid and a waste of
> on-air space.
>
> Then I remembered the essence of my NCJ Article last year "Meaningful
> Contest Exchanges", so I'll plug the concept again for possible inclusion
> into The Perfect Contest.
>
> As entry into many "sporting" events requires a contestant to register,
> make part of 'The Perfect Contest" exchange the sending and receiving of
> the entrants' reg number.  In today's computer age, this is a total no
> brainer...no different than setting up a password on a website and having
> it auto-emailed to you... a combination of alpha/numeic like:
>
> AX71P93Q.
>
> A simple little PHP/MySQL website for registration will do the
> trick.  Every year the reg number will be different, so we can all throw
> away our pre-fill logger crutches!
>
> Ohhh, gosh...maybe you noticed...this would also provide an challenging
> opportunity for increasing everyone's contesting skillset, especially in
> QRM :-)   Since the contest sponsor has the master list of entrant
> registration numbers, auto-log checking would be a no-brainer.
>
> IMHO, 599, 5NN as well as Five-Nine/Fifty-Nine have outlived their
> UN-usefulness, and should be banned from the contesting world for
> perpetuity.  If I hear "E T T K" in the CQ WW CW, I'm think gonna scream
> (internally) again ... almost as loud as when I hear those LID DX stations
> making 15 QSOs without giving their callsign(s) ;-(
>
> 73...
>
> Rick, K6VVA
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>