CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in IARU

To: "'CQ Contest Reflector'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in IARU
From: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 01:45:57 +0200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Dave,

I wonder how many DL stations are in the GB5HQ Log?
DA0HQ never asks stations to work only them as well

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Dave Lawley

Just to correct the arithmetic in an earlier posting

 >IARU 2005

 >QSOs made with own country

 >GB5HQ - 3120 out of 12 515 (app 30 % )
 >EM7HQ - 1976 out of 10 947 (app 20 % )
 >R9HQ - 1621 - out of  7 638 (app. 22 % )
 >SN0HQ- 8203 out of  17 584 (app. 45 % )
 >DA0HQ - app. 9 000 out of  19 900 (app. 46 % )

That's 25% not 30%. This year our percentage is below 20%. And 
critically, we never ask Gs to come on and work only GB5HQ. We want them 
to enjoy the contest and make as many QSOs as possible. I believe it is 
unethical to work only your own country, and if the problem cannot be 
addressed by any other means then I would support exclusion of own 
country uniques, leaving it up to the adjudicators precisely how to 
define a unique.


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>