CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL?

Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL?
From: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:15:38 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Any of these methods (QRL?, ?, IE) still require common sense and 
courtesy.  Many ops act like as long as they send one of these, unless 
they get some raving lunatic response they have established their right 
to the frequency.

I've had people sent "QRL?" less than a second after I just finished 
sending a contest CQ  - come on, that's not at all reasonable.  How many 
times have you been in the middle of a QSO when somebody blows in with a 
loud "dit-dit-dah-dah-dit-dit" and you know they're going to start 
pressing the F1 key within the next few milliseconds?

If you want to be "courteous", and have a "legitimate" claim to use a 
frequency in a contest, the right thing to do is to listen for a short 
time first, then send your preferred query more than once, with a 
reasonable amount of time for any station to react.  If you don't hear 
anything, then you can proceed with confidence.  If somebody comes back 
from the bathroom and wants their frequency back, that's too bad.

I've started trying to do this because I hate being the bad guy in a 
frequency battle.  Yes, your heart stops beating while you're listening 
on an (apparently) empty frequency hoping nobody will send, but it's the 
right thing to do.

73,

Dave/K8CC


steve.root@culligan4water.com wrote:
> Whatever happened to "dit-dit dit" ? That's even shorter than "?" and used to 
> get the job done.
>
> 73 Steve K0SR
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>   


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>