CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Frequency Conservation

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Frequency Conservation
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:18:25 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Guys....

The ARRL has asked for comments on the lastest FCC R&O and it's effect 
on the current band plans by October 31.

See http://www.arrl.org/?artid=6864 and/or send comments to 
bandplan@arrl.org .

73,
Steve, N2IC

K0HB wrote:
>>Whatever non-contest digital activity exists above 3600 can easily
>>move below 3600. 
>>
> 
> 
> Including the auto-robots now held in a corral at 3620-3635?  Will they now
> get a 15kHz "reservation" somewhere in 3525-3600?  That would amount to 20%
> of the CW space available to Generals which would become at risk to their
> mindless 'brrp, brrp, brrp".  (There's a reason they were herded up into
> that remote spot in the band.)
> 
> As an aside, it is a measure of the FCC's lack of self-awareness of their
> own regs that they didn't bother to amend §97.221(b) as part of the R&O.
> 
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> --
>  ><{{{{*>    http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>