CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Annoying trend

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend
From: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:17:56 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 


déjà vu all over again!

The ARRL has already said you can pick whatever number you want.  They don't
care. 

End of transmission
Over and out
..._._

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of KI9A@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 3:36 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend

 
In a message dated 1/23/2007 3:25:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
johngeig@yahoo.com writes:

---  Kjboasi@aol.com wrote:

>From now on, the check
> gets chosen  randomly before the contest.  

Then you are in violation of the  rules and should be
moved to the checklog or disqualified category.   The
rules specifically state:

4. Exchange: The required exchange  consists of: 

4.4. Check (the last two digits of the year you  were first licensed)




Wow.  Way I see it is last two of year you were first licensed...Ham
license I assume, but, maybe any other license will do to fulfill that.
 
I was wondering, since some are really picking this last two you were
licensed deal apart, if they will DQ themselves because some reports call
for signal report, of which all are given 59, when, in reality, they are not
all 59...Pretty much the same in my book.
 
73-Chuck KI9A
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>