CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY

To: "'Eric Hilding'" <b38@hilding.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY
From: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 00:41:33 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The CQWW RTTY Contest has truly become a major event on par with the Phone
and CW versions.  Activity is growing every year.

I suggest the TQP think about moving to a different weekend!  I would love
to work them, but the RTTY contest is more fun.

Randy, K5ZD
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Eric Hilding
> Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 2:21 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY
> 
> Methinks there needs to be some "Gentleperson's Agreement" 
> put in place to dispense with the major problem of CQ RTTY 
> stations thrashing the Texas QSO Party on 40m.
> 
> Like, keep 7.047 to 7.053 (at least) free for the 
> Distinguished Contesters from Texas to also enjoy their 
> event.  RTTY on 40m was down to about 7.025 on Saturday 
> morning, with the #&^! Chinese Woodpecker wreaking havoc here 
> up to 7.020 which left only 5Khz for any kind decent CW on 40m.
> 
> FWIW & 73...
> 
> Rick, K6VVA
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>