To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] 30 hour WPX? |
From: | kr2q@optimum.net |
Date: | Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:57:58 +0000 (GMT) |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Hmmm. I'm not sure...maybe a bit torn. I liked the 30 hour format when it was in place, but I like operating more hours too. I think I like "more" a little bit "more" than I do like a little bit "less," so how about 34 hours? Okay...a show of hands now. How many of you had so much energy during the 30 hour event that you changed your callsign to hold your run frequency while you had to take the dreaded OFF time with your real callsign? de Doug KR2Q _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX and 30 Hour Nonsense, jeff stai |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Move WPX Back to 30 Hours?, Dick Green WC1M |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] WPXSSB More 30 hour NONSENSE, Robert Shohet |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 30 hour WPX?, Trey Garlough |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |