CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] State QSO parties and CW

To: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] State QSO parties and CW
From: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:02:52 -0500 (CDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It certainly would for me! That's also why I like to work CW on Field Day.

73, Zack W9SZ

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, John Geiger wrote:

> The Florida QSO party this past weekend reminded me of
> something I have observed for the past few years.
> With the exception of maybe the California QSO party,
> there seems to be much more CW than SSB activity for
> state QSO parties.
>
> I am not complaining as I like CW contests and just
> tolerate SSB contests, but why is this?  It seems that
> SSB would be easier to run while mobile.
>
> Does the extra points that CW QSOs score relative to
> SSB QSOs make everyone stick with CW?
>
> 73s John AA5JG
>
>
>      
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>