CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY replace CW contesting??

To: Shelby Summerville <k4ww@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY replace CW contesting??
From: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:55:34 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Mar 29, 2008, at 6:38 AM, Shelby Summerville wrote:

> "CW, if for no other reason, the
> relaxation of requiring CW as a requirement for licensing, will surely
> disappear"


I'm not sure if I agree with this. There are at least four good  
reasons to use CW, even if it is not required for licensing:

1) DXing -- some DX is either only on CW, or is substantially easier  
to work on CW. (This is especially true on the low bands)

2) Contesting -- nearly half of all major contests are on CW. If you  
can't work CW, you miss out on a lot of contests.

3) QRP -- CW transmitters are substantially easier to build than SSB  
transmitters, CW signals tend to reach further, even at QRP levels.

4) Fun -- CW is a heck of a lot of fun.

While you are certainly correct that the popularity of CW may  
diminish, I don't believe that CW will ever completely disappear.

Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
             -- Wilbur Wright, 1901

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>