Thank you, Captain Obvious.
I was attempting to cut the tension on this issue with a tongue-in-cheek
parody, but I see it's far too serious an issue to be the subject of humor.
CU in NAQP,
73, de Hans, K0HB
Just a boy and his fractured equations
--
><{{{{*> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb
> [Original Message]
> From: Robert L. Shohet <kq2m@earthlink.net>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Date: 8/2/2008 1:49:59 AM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Reflections on comments about open logs,right
versus wrong, etc.
>
> Hans,
>
> This proof is nonsense and does not work either
> symbolically or mathematically.
>
> You say that 3l = r = -w. If that is true then
> 3l = -w .
>
> Then you say that l = r = -w.
>
> That would mean that 3l = l, which is mathematically
> impossible.
>
> You had asked to be proved that you are wrong, and
> now you have.
>
> This proof also does not work symbolically. Left and right are
> directions not measurements. Left and Right have no fixed distance
> so you can't assume that one is equal to the other since mathematical
> equations use values not ideologies. But when you use the same
> mathematical symbol (r, l, -w) its values must remain constant
> within the same set of equations that you are solving for or you can't
> solve for them.
>
> On the real issue, I also agree with W5OV, but that is a different matter.
>
> Bob KQ2M
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|