| To: | <k3bu@optimum.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs |
| From: | "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | K0HB <K0HB@ARRL.ORG> |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Dec 2008 02:26:46 -0000 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > I think it is well summarized, plus who is the best to do the "secondary" > check than next one or few competitors in the category. > Vigilante-ism at its finest. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry Rules, AD5VJ Bob |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs: Why?, K0HB |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs, k3bu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs, Ron Notarius W3WN |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |