CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM
From: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:01:28 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>From the 2008 CQWW Rules page:

4. Electronic log submission: We
want your electronic log. The Committee
requires an electronic log for any
possible high-scoring log. By submitting
a log to the CQ WW Contest, the entrant
agrees to have the log open to the public.
If possible, we would appreciate
complete frequencies in the log.


If you don't like it...don't submit your log.

NOW...could we move ON please to something of 'interest'.

---- David Kopacz <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com> wrote: 
> I suggest it is more likely:
> 
> 89% didn't take the poll
> 6% favor open logs
> 3% don't care
> 2% opposed
> 
> Even if the poll on contesting.com were an accurate representation of
> the contesting population, one must keep in mind that just because
> something is popular, doesn't make it right (slavery comes to mind here)
> 
> The results are likely similar to the response I received after
> announcing withholding my logs from CQ Magazine.
> 
> Publicly, a few squeaky wheels shouted loudly against my action, while
> privately via email, more than twice as many applauded my decision to
> take a stand.
> 
> I'll be more than happy to release my logs for inspection to the
> paranoid, the accusers, the naysayers and those that simply think there
> must be "more to the story", once the results are published.
> 
> Mission accomplished.
> 
> David ~ KY1V
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of VE5ZX
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 9:32 AM
> To: 'CQ-Contest com'
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM
> 
> > Likewise, I continue on philosophical and political grounds to oppose
> the
> > concept of "open logs" as is currently being debated.  That doesn't
> mean I
> 
> The current survey on contesting.com suggests opposition to open logs
> for 
> any reason maybe a minority opinion.
> 
> 61% favor open logs, 24% don't care and 8% are opposed.
> 
> 
> ... Sylvan
> 
> Sylvan Katz, VE5ZX
> Saskatoon, SK
> 
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>