CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day class question

To: "'Nate Bargmann'" <n0nb@n0nb.us>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day class question
From: "Paul Mackanos - K2DB" <k2db@k2db.com>
Reply-to: k2db@k2db.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:19:37 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Try talking to N1ND (Dan Henderson) n1nd@arrl.net or KX9X (Sean Kutzko)
kx9x@arrl.net at ARRL.
It is the ARRL who makes the rules.

Paul K2DB

-----Original Message-----
From: Nate Bargmann [mailto:n0nb@n0nb.us] 
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 3:45 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day class question

* On 2010 27 Jun 14:32 -0500, KI9A@aol.com wrote:
> Guys-
>  
> Who makes the rules for FD? is it the CAC?

I'm not sure, although I'd bet the ARRL contest administrator has a say.

> If the ARRL let the 1A class use either a GOTA, or a VHF station, that  
> would really increase participation, or, am I dreaming?

You're not dreaming.  Our club is quite small, and, yes, we're aging and
we've never been able to field enough ops to keep two stations going let
alone the bonus stations, so we operate 1A.  However, I would like the
idea of being able to field a VHF/UHF station as a 1A as, especially
around these parts, rates would be low but perhaps new interest would be
generated in VHF/UHF as it is very low around here despite many hams
having all mode HF/6m/2m/70cm rigs.

> All in all, WHY did they remove it? Seems like a dumb idea to me! 

Good question.

73, de Nate >>

-- 

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."

Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://n0nb.us/index.html


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>