CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Ambiguity in the Rules: OED

To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ambiguity in the Rules: OED
From: Chris Pedder <chris@g3vbl.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:07:21 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm afraid the Oxford English Dictionary got there before you.

Chris


At 21:17 19/12/2010, Geoffrey Way  KA1IOR wrote:
>Innovation should never be limited to just the
>technology, it should also be included in "Operating Event Design©"
>
>That's MY innovation, that last phrase.
>So I'm putting my copyright on it. Feel free to use OED for short.


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>