CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Can a call be too short?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Can a call be too short?
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:08:37 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I know when we got the call we were extremely excited,  W9ET.  but I 
Know it works and it works good,  but when sending it we end up having 
to send it with some extra spaces in it,  like W9 E T   with a extra 
space after the 9 and the E otherwise we do indeed get a lot of repeat 
Requests,

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 2/15/2012 9:48 AM, John Geiger wrote:
> I am helping with some research about ideal calls in terms of DXing and 
> contesting, and was rereading some of the old posts about ideal letters in a 
> callsign. I wonder if some combinations can be too short for CW?  Do the 
> single character letters like E and T tend to get lost in pileups and require 
> repeats a lot?  Would a suffix like EET or TET be problematic?  Or does it 
> help that they are shorter to send?
>
> 73s John AA5JG
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>