CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARROGANCE AND GOING SPLIT

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARROGANCE AND GOING SPLIT
From: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 10:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>




>________________________________
> From: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>...
>
>
N6TJ wrote: If we're not employing the latest technology, we're dinosaurs.
>People do little to promote what made DXing and contesting great in the
>first place: OPERATOR SKILLS.
>I agree completely!  We must not forget that many of the great advances in 
>radio communications were (and I hope "will be"!) the result of 
>experimentation and development by radio amateurs.  To conserve bandwidth here 
>I won't try to list them, but those of you with years of experience already 
>could cite them all!!  There are always bad apples in any barrel, but we must 
>not quit, or get discouraged because some don't behave with respect toward all 
>others--and it sure that those bad operators are NOT following this thread so 
>they can't benefit from the observations expressed here!!

73, Scott  AA0AA; XE1/AA0AA
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>