CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW

To: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW
From: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 09:43:53 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It's been an interesting thread, and has shortened my "Respected Contesters" 
roster by at least a couple of calls.

73, de Hans, K0HB
aka: oblivious




On Sep 2, 2012, at 5:14 AM, Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com> wrote:

> My mother used to warn me to stay away from tough crowds.  Little did I know 
> I would still be avoiding them when I was 70.  I think I'll just stay home 
> and watch Ed Sullivan....
> 
> Dick
> 
> --
> Dick Flanagan K7VC
> dick@k7vc.com
> 
> On 9/1/2012 11:03 PM, Edward Sawyer wrote:
>> Interesting thread.  I think Jim and Pete are both right.  The key is to
>> jostle and tale charge as necessary but not let the casual op even know what
>> is going on.  By definition, the casual op is oblivious, honestly. So, you
>> can do some serious stuff that would "tweak" the true competitor and the
>> casual guy won't be any worse for wear if its done right.
>> 
>>  
>> By the way..real men have their AGC off and don't know or care if the needle
>> is pegged to the right.  If you can pick off callers coming back.it's a
>> clear frequency.because people can hear you and you can hear them.
>> 
>>  
>> "Go big or go home".
>> 
>>  
>> Ed N1UR (heck I don't even own an amp)
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>