On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Just returned from West Africa Toivo.Your approach works there as well.
> The
> >only difference was, I had to ID every 6 or 7 QSO when pileup was really
> >heavy.There are other methods of pileup management such as turning output
> >power down, increase CW speed and split as the last resort. But most
> >important the operator should be able to sustain rate of 200 + QSO per
> >hour. If DX op is slow it irritates everybody and attracts CL? much too
> >often.
>
> >73, Igor UA9CDC
>
> Also on pileup management - turn the IF SHIFT or PBT control on your rig
> on top of the pile way off to the side of the BW filter. Once you have an
> effective filter BW of something close to zero you'll hear one or two
> stations at a time even if the pileup is at blizzard level and don't have
> to resort to the RIT. I've employed this many times, including last
> weekend's CQ WW CW @PJ4D.
>
> 73
> Scott Robbins
> W4PA
>
> Agree Scott. During WW, essentially did the same thing... plus I added a
very narrow APF filter on the FT1K Mark 5 I was using. Effective bandwidth
was very narrow.. Say, 200Hz or so. Even when the pile is big, I just rock
the PBT a bit to find guys. Still, only one problem w/packet: the
frequency is set automatically. There is still no solution for zero-beat
callers of the same signal strength.
73, Gerry W1VE
_______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|