CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted

To: Ktfrog007@aol.com,cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
From: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:51:17 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Usually if it says nothing, the assumption is that you must classify yourself 
as multi-single as the single operator rules have language about the -operator- 
doing all of the activity.

ARRL 160 and ARRL 10 do not have separate assisted categories - necessitating 
that assisted ops enter as multi single entries.

73 Rich NN3W

Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone

----- Reply message -----
From: Ktfrog007@aol.com
Date: Fri, Jan 25, 2013 7:30 am
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>

If a contest's rules say nothing about Assisted operation, does that mean  
it's allowed without restriction? 
 
Note that Single-Op has no uniform definition.  For example, in the  ARRL 
RTTY Roundup, Single-Ops cannot be Assisted, while in the CQ WPX  RTTY 
everyone can operate Assisted.
 
73,
Kermit (Ken) AB1J
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>